Communication protocols in industrial automation form the backbone of modern manufacturing, ensuring seamless data exchange between control systems and devices on the production line. This communication is not merely about data transfer; it is the foundation of the stability and efficiency of the entire production process. Choosing the right communication protocol affects speed, determinism, and system integration, directly influencing plant efficiency. But should the choice of protocol be dictated by the capabilities of the PLC controller or the peripheral devices? In today’s complex production environment, numerous protocols are available, each with different origins, functionalities, and purposes. PROFINET, developed in Europe, and EtherNet/IP, widely used in North America, both rely on Ethernet technology, enabling fast and reliable real-time data transmission. However, older protocols like PROFIBUS and DeviceNet still have their place where compatibility with existing infrastructure is required. How then does one navigate this technological complexity to choose a solution that best meets the specific requirements of an installation?
Table of Contents
Types of Communication Protocols in Industrial Automation
In industrial automation, a wide range of communication protocols has been developed in response to various needs and technologies. They can be divided into two main categories: legacy serial protocols and modern Ethernet protocols. Each has its unique features and applications.
Legacy serial protocols, such as PROFIBUS and DeviceNet, emerged when reliable communication in simpler automation systems was required. PROFIBUS, developed in Germany, dominated the European market, offering stable communication based on the RS-485 bus, allowing real-time data exchange at the field device level. Meanwhile, DeviceNet, based on the CAN bus, gained popularity in North America, where it was used in simpler applications for controlling sensors and actuators.
Over time, in response to the growing demand for faster and more flexible systems, modern Ethernet protocols like EtherNet/IP and PROFINET emerged. Based on Ethernet technology, these protocols offer significantly higher bandwidths and the ability to integrate with IT systems. EtherNet/IP became the standard in the USA, providing flexible communication between controllers and peripheral devices, while PROFINET dominated the European market due to its deterministic real-time communication, making it ideal for complex production processes.
Among these technologies are also specialized solutions such as EtherCAT, designed for systems requiring ultra-low latency and precise synchronization. Each of these protocols addresses different industry needs, making their choice dependent on both the application’s specifics and the ability to integrate with existing infrastructure.
Data Transfer Speeds in Industrial Automation: What Does It Mean for Your Production Line?
In industrial automation, data transfer speed is more than just numbers on paper. It ensures that your machines and devices can work in harmony, responding to signals in fractions of a second. Consider this: in a dynamic production line, every millisecond can determine quality and efficiency. EtherNet/IP and PROFINET are true leaders in this field, offering transfer speeds of 100 Mbps, with newer versions reaching up to 1 Gbps. What does this mean in practice? With such speeds, you can easily manage complex systems with hundreds of sensors and actuators, where quick response and minimal delays are crucial.
But speed isn’t everything. Take EtherCAT for example – it operates at “only” 100 Mbps, but its architecture allows for extremely low latency. For applications like multi-axis control or precise CNC systems, every microsecond counts, and EtherCAT is the undisputed leader here.
On the other hand, older protocols like PROFIBUS and DeviceNet still offer reliability in less complex applications, where bandwidth isn’t critical, but stability and resistance to interference are.
| Protocol | Transmission Speed | Typical Latency | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| EtherNet/IP | 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps | 1-10 ms | High bandwidth, widely used in North America, flexible communication. |
| PROFINET RT | 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps | ~10 ms | Real-Time, suitable for most real-time applications. |
| PROFINET IRT | 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps | < 1 ms | Isochronous Real-Time, ideal for applications requiring precise synchronization. |
| EtherCAT | 100 Mbps | < 100 μs | Very low latency, exceptional real-time synchronization, ideal for handling a large number of axes. |
| PROFIBUS DP | Up to 12 Mbps | 1-10 ms | Used in Europe, stable in applications with lower speed requirements. |
| DeviceNet | 125 kbps, 250 kbps, 500 kbps | 10-100 ms | Slower protocol based on CAN bus, used in simpler systems. |
| CANopen | Up to 1 Mbps | < 10 ms | Used in embedded applications and systems with low bandwidth requirements. |
| Modbus RTU | 1.2 kbps – 115.2 kbps | 10-100 ms | Slower protocol, used in simple serial communication applications. |
| Modbus TCP/IP | Up to 100 Mbps | 1-10 ms | Ethernet version of Modbus, much faster and more flexible. |
Controller Manufacturers and Supported Protocols
In industrial automation, the choice of PLC controller often determines which communication protocols will be used in a given system. Major PLC manufacturers support a variety of protocols to ensure flexibility and integration with different devices and systems.
Siemens
Siemens, especially with its SIMATIC S7 line, supports:
- PROFINET
- PROFIBUS
- Modbus TCP/IP
Rockwell Automation (Allen-Bradley)
ControlLogix and CompactLogix controllers support:
- EtherNet/IP
- DeviceNet
- Modbus TCP/IP
Mitsubishi Electric
MELSEC controllers support:
- CC-Link
- EtherNet/IP
- PROFINET
- Modbus TCP/IP
Schneider Electric
Modicon controllers support:
- Modbus (RTU and TCP/IP)
- EtherNet/IP
- PROFINET
Beckhoff Automation
Beckhoff, known for its TwinCAT controllers, supports:
- EtherCAT
- Modbus TCP/IP
- PROFINET
- EtherNet/IP
Omron
Sysmac and NX controllers support:
- EtherNet/IP
- PROFINET
- Modbus TCP/IP
Factors Influencing the Choice of Communication Protocols in Industrial Automation
Choosing a protocol in industrial automation is not just about data transfer speed or low latency. Several other practical factors need to be considered to select the best solution for your installation. Here are some key aspects that can influence this decision:
- Compatibility with Existing Infrastructure
If your company already has systems operating on older protocols like PROFIBUS or DeviceNet, upgrading to newer solutions like PROFINET or EtherNet/IP may involve additional costs and complications. In some cases, it may be worth sticking with older technology if it is still efficient and stable, to avoid excessive expenses. - Real-Time Requirements and Determinism
If you have applications requiring precise synchronization – such as controlling a large number of devices simultaneously – choosing a protocol with low latency, like EtherCAT, can be crucial. These protocols guarantee that data will be processed within a specified time, which is critical when every millisecond counts. - Scalability
If you plan to expand your system in the future, protocols like EtherNet/IP or PROFINET offer greater flexibility in expansion. The ease of integrating new devices and support for various network topologies make these protocols ideal for expanding the system without needing to overhaul the entire infrastructure. - Cost and Equipment Availability
Simple systems often do not require the most advanced technologies, which is why Modbus TCP remains popular due to its simplicity and low implementation costs. More advanced protocols, like EtherCAT, may require more expensive equipment but offer much better performance in advanced applications.
FAQ – Communication Protocols in Industrial Automation
It depends on the application. If you need low latency and precise synchronization, EtherCAT is a good choice. For more flexible solutions and IT integration, PROFINET or EtherNet/IP are better.
Yes, PROFIBUS is still used in older installations but is gradually being replaced by newer solutions like PROFINET and EtherNet/IP, which offer higher speed and better integration.
EtherCAT is optimized for real-time, offering very low latency and deterministic communication, making it ideal for controlling a large number of devices.
Modbus TCP is simple and inexpensive to implement, but it does not offer the speed and determinism of PROFINET or EtherNet/IP. However, it is suitable for simpler applications.
When choosing a protocol, consider transmission speed, latency, determinism, system scalability, and compatibility with existing infrastructure and devices.